Internal tickets
Turns 'the printer is down' in Slack into a routed ticket with an owner, chases it to closure, and closes it only with proof of the fix — an audit trail instead of a shouting match.
Requests live in chat threads
whoever shouts loudest gets served.
Slack is where requests go to scroll away
'Anyone know why the label printer is down?' gets three emojis and no owner. Four hours later, dispatch is hand-writing labels.
Everyone's problem is no one's
Facilities thinks IT has it. IT thinks facilities has it. The person who reported it thinks someone has it. Nobody has it.
Closed isn't the same as fixed
Tickets get closed to clear the queue, and the same printer is down again Thursday. Without proof of fix, closure is just silence.
The fix took eleven minutes. Finding an owner took four hours.
Reported once. Routed at once. Closed only with proof.
- Ticket opened — from the Slack message, no form
- Owner: facilities — routed by category and site
- Dispatch impact: labels hand-written until fixed
"Label printer in dispatch is down again — orders are stacking up."
Opens the ticket from the message, tags the asset, routes to facilities with the impact noted.
- Facilities pinged — on-call tech accepted in 4 minutes
- Service contract: printer under vendor SLA, case eligible
Pings the on-call facilities tech with the asset history — same printer, third failure this quarter.
Opens a case under the service contract in parallel — if the tech can't fix it, the vendor visit is already booked.
Posts the workaround to dispatch: labels rerouted to the front-desk printer, mapped in one click.
- Fixed 10:04 AM — feed roller replaced
- Proof attached: test-print photo on the ticket
Won't close without proof — asks the tech for a test print; the photo lands on the ticket.
Cancels the parallel vendor visit — not needed, case closed at zero cost.
52 minutes report-to-fixed, every step timestamped.
- Third failure this quarter on the same asset
- Replace-vs-repair drafted: repair spend now exceeds replacement
Approve the replacement — the failure history and spend are on the case.
Requests stop being folklore. Every asset has a history; every fix has proof.
Same requests. With owners.
| Moment | Before Clarwiz | On Clarwiz |
|---|---|---|
| Reporting | A Slack message, hoping. | A ticket with an owner, from that same message. |
| Routing | Whoever feels guilty first. | By category, site and on-call — in seconds. |
| The workaround | Everyone improvises. | Posted to the affected team immediately. |
| Closure | 'Should be fine now.' | Proof of fix attached, or it stays open. |
| Patterns | The same printer, a fresh surprise. | Third failure flagged; replace-vs-repair drafted. |
Do people have to file tickets in a portal now?
How does it know who owns what?
What counts as proof of a fix?
Does it escalate if an owner sits on a ticket?
What do we need to integrate before a demo?
See this run on your own data.
Thirty minutes, nothing connected.
We take this process, connect nothing, and show you the run end to end on your real conversations and orders. When you're ready, go live at the autonomy level you choose.